Joshua 1:8
Thursday, December 25, 2014
A Son is Given
Saturday, December 20, 2014
THE JEWISH BACKGROUND OF CHRISTIAN BAPTISM
By Ron Moseley, Ph. D.
There is no question that the church is debtor to Judaism for its main structure including such items as Messiah, Scripture, canon, liturgy, altar, pulpit, church offices, songs, offerings, the Lord's Supper, as well as baptism itself. Dr. Merrill Tenney, the editor of the Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible said, "Baptism as a rite of immersion was not begun by Christians but was taken by them from Jewish and pagan forms...." Since early Christianity was a part of the Judaism of Jesus' day, it is without question that baptism in today's church was originally Jewish. Further evidence comes from Scholars like William Lasor and David Daube who tell us of the early church's practice of baptism by self immersion after the custom of the Jews.
History of the Jewish Mikveh
The term mikveh in Hebrew literally means any gathering of waters, but is specifically used in Jewish law for the waters or bath for the ritual immersion. The building of the mikveh was so important in ancient times it was said to take precedence over the construction of a synagogue. Immersion was so important that it occurred before the high Priest conducted the service on the Day of Atonement, before the regular priests participated in the Temple service, before each person entered the Temple complex, before a scribe wrote the name of God, as well as several other occasions.
The Mishnah attributes to Ezra a decree that each male should immerse himself before praying or studying. There were several Jewish groups that observed ritual immersion every day to assure readiness for the coming of the Messiah. The Church Fathers mentioned one of these groups called Hemerobaptists which means "daily bathers" in Greek. Among those used to regular immersion were the Essenes and others that the Talmud calls tovelei shaharit or "dawn bathers."
On the third day of creation we see the source of the word mikveh for the first time in Genesis 1:10 when the Lord says, "...to the gathering (mikveh) of waters, He called seas." Because of this reference in Genesis the ocean is still a legitimate mikveh.
The Mikvaot Around The Temple
The New Testament tells us that many of the early church's daily activities were centered around the Temple. Historically, we know that there were many ritual immersion baths (mikvaot) on the Temple Mount including one in the Chamber of Lepers situated in the northwest corner of the Court of Women (Mid. 2:5). Josephus tells us that even during the years of war (66-73 A.D.) the laws of ritual immersion were strictly adhered to (Jos. Wars, 4:205). The Temple itself contained immersion baths in various places for the priests to use, even in the vaults beneath the court (Commentary to Tam. 26b; Tam. 1:1). The High Priest had special immersion pools in the Temple, two of which are mentioned in the Mishnah. We are told one of these was in the Water Gate in the south of the court and another was on the roof of the Parva Chamber (Mid. 1:4; Mid. 5:3). There was an additional place for immersion on the Mount of Olives which was connected with the burning of the red heifer (Par. 3:7). A special ramp led to the mikveh on the Mount of Olives from the Temple Mount, which was built as an arched way over another arched way to avoid uncleanness from the graves in the valley below. Recent archaeological excavations have found 48 different mikvaot near the Monumental Staircase leading into the Temple Complex.
Three Basic Areas
According to Jewish law there are three basic areas where immersion in the mikveh is required.
1. Immersion is required for both men and women when converting to Judaism. There were three prerequisites for a proselyte coming into Judaism: Circumcision, baptism, and sacrifice (Maimonides, Hilkh. Iss. Biah xiii. 5).
2. Immersion is required after a woman has her monthly period (Lev. 15:28).
3. Immersion is required for pots and eating utensils manufactured by a non-Jew (Encyclopedia of Jewish Religion p-263).
Besides these, there are other times when it is customary to be immersed in the mikveh such as the occasion before Yom Kippur as a sign of purity and repentance and before the Sabbath in order to sensitize oneself to the holiness of the day.
The Six Descending Orders of Ritual Immersion
There are six descending orders of ritual baths in the Mishnah (Oral Laws of how to accomplish the written Law) and the highest order is that of a spring or flowing river. We see Jesus understanding and fulfilling this order in Matthew 3:16 as He comes to be baptized in the Jordan River "fulfilling all righteousness." This highest order was called Living Water and illustrated the forgiving of sins, therefore, we hear Jesus using this term concerning Himself (John 4:10-11).
The Water Restrictions
The term sa'ah is an ancient Biblical measurement equivalent to approximately five gallons. All six requirements come from the original Hebrew words found in Leviticus 11:36. Rabbi Yitzchok ben Sheshes said the amount of 40 sa'ah was derived from the idea that the largest normal human body has a volume of 20 sa'ah, therefore the amount of water needed to "nullify" this body is double this amount or 40 sa'ah.
Why Be Immersed?
To the ancient Jew, the mikveh was a process of spiritual purification and cleansing, especially in relation to the various types of Turmah or ritual defilement when the Temple was in use. Although God has not revealed all the meaning of the mikveh, it is obvious because of the amount of space given to it in Scripture, and the effort of Jesus to fulfill it, the command is of utmost importance. All commands of the Lord fall into three categories:
1. The moral or ethical laws that are necessary for man to live in harmony are known as Mishpatim and are literally translated judgments.
2. The rituals and festivals which reawaken us to important religious truths such as Sabbath, holidays, the Tefillin and the Mezuzah that remind us of God's presence are known as Edos and are literally translated witnesses.
3. The third group often has no explicit reason given for their existence except for Israel's identification as God's chosen people to the other nations (Deuteronomy 4:6). This group of laws are known as Chukim and are literally translated as decrees. Among the decrees of this group are the dietary laws as well as ritual immersion.
How Immersion Was Done
Jewish baptism has never been taken lightly, but in ancient times immersion was to be performed in the presence of witnesses (Yebam. 47b). The person being baptized made special preparations by cutting his nails, undressed completely and made a fresh profession of his faith before the designated "fathers of the baptism" (Kethub. 11a; Erub 15a). This is possibly where churches, sometime later, got the term Godfathers. The individual stood straight up with the feet spread and the hands held out in front. The candidate would totally immerse themselves by squatting in the water with a witness or baptizer doing the officiating. Note the New Testament points out the fact that Jesus came up straightway out of the water (Matthew 3:16).
The earliest drawing of Christian baptism was found on the wall of a Roman catacomb in the second century showing John standing on the bank of the Jordan helping Jesus back to shore after self immersion.
Ancient sages teach that the word mikveh has the same letters as Ko(v)Meh, the Hebrew word for "rising" or "standing tall," therefore we see the idea of being baptized "straightway."
Although it is the Jewish belief that repentance is necessary, purification from defilement is done primarily through water, while other effects of sins are covered by blood (Romans 4:7; note the "almost all things" in Hebrews 9:22). The concept of immersion in rabbinic literature is referred to as a new birth (Yeb. 22a; 48b; 97b; Mass. Ger. c.ii). Note six other important aspects of ancient Jewish immersion:
1.Immersion was accompanied by exhortations and benedictions (Maimonides Hilkh. Milah iii.4; Hilkh. Iss, Biah Xiv .6). A convert would reaffirm his acceptance of the Torah by declaring, "I will do and I will hear" which was a phrase from the oath that was originally taken by the priests not to forsake the Torah (Deuteronomy 29:9- 14). This ritual demonstrates the willingness of the convert to forsake his Gentile background and assume his Jewish identity by taking on the status of one who keeps the commandments. According to a number of Jewish sages, mayim, which is the Hebrew word for water, shares the same root as the word "mah", meaning "what." This teaching points out that when a person immerses in water, he is nullifying the fleshly ego and is asking, "what am I?" in the same manner that Moses and Aaron did in Exodus 16:7 when they said to the Lord, "we are what?"
2. The Jewish baptism candidates were often immersed three times. The idea of total immersion comes from the Scripture in Leviticus 15:16 when it says, "he shall wash all his flesh in the water." One reason it was customary to immerse three times was because the word mikveh occurs three times in the Torah.
3. According to Jewish law the immersion had to have a required witness. Dr. William LaSor in the Biblical Archaeology Review says apparently the Biblical phrase "in the name of" was an indication of the required witness. In several New Testament references such as I Corinthians 1:13, 15; Matthew 21:25; Acts 1:22; and Acts 19:3 we see early baptism mentioned in conjunction with the name of individuals such as John and Paul. Further information on this can be found in Jewish literature concerning proselyte baptism where it indicates his baptism required attestation by witnesses in whose name he was immersed.
4. The immersion candidate was not touched by the baptizer in Jesus' day. Because Leviticus 15:16 says "He shall wash all his flesh in the water," Judaism stresses that the entire body must come in contact with the water of the mikveh. To insure the immersion was valid, no clothing or individuals could touch the candidate. Any such intervention that prevented the water from reaching a part of the body was known as Chatzitzah and rendered the immersion invalid. Although the mikveh was more spiritual than physical, often the bath had two sets of steps, one entering and another leaving so as not to defile what had been purified.
5. The baptismal water (Mikveh) in rabbinic literature was referred to as the womb of the world, and as a convert came out of the water it was considered a new birth separating him from the pagan world. As the convert came out of these waters his status was changed and he was referred to as "a little child just born" or "a child of one day" (Yeb. 22a; 48b; 97b). We see the New Testament using similar Jewish terms as "born anew," "new creation," and "born from above." According to Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum rabbinic literature uses the term "born again" to refer to at least six different occurrences. Note each of these life changing experiences: (a) When a Gentile converts to Judaism. (b) When an individual is crowned king. (c) At age 13 when a Jewish boy chooses to embrace God's covenant and be numbered with the believers. (d) When an individual gets married. (e) When an individual becomes a rabbi. (f) When an individual becomes the head of a rabbinical school.
6. Jewish law requires at least three witnesses made up of qualified leaders to be present for certain immersions (Yebam 47b). Ordinarily a member of the Sanhedrin performed the act of observing the proselytes immersion, but in case of necessity others could do it. Secret baptism, or where only the mother brought a child, was not acknowledged.
Repentance Without Baptism
One of the most important teachings in Judaism is that of repentance. According to both Scripture and rabbinic literature, no matter how great the sin, if a person repents and forsakes the sin before God he can be forgiven. As we see in the case of John, Jesus, and all New Testament writers, repentance was always involved. The Jerusalem Talmud states, "nothing can stand before repentance" (Yebamos 47b). According to Dr. David Flusser, the Dead Sea Scrolls as well as the New Testament teach that water can purify the body only if the soul has first been purified through repentance and righteousness.
Water and Blood Both Illustrate God's Cleansing In Judaism
Both water and blood are used constantly in the Torah and the New Testament as the two main agents to illustrate God's cleansing. The Jews believe that uncleanness is not physical, but rather a spiritual condition as related in Leviticus 11:44 where it states by wrong actions one can make the "soul unclean." Therefore, the purification through ritual immersion, as commanded in Scripture is basically involved with the soul, rather than the body. Note how both water and blood are cited in Scripture: (1) Blood is used in cleansing in relation to the Passover Lamb (Exodus 12). (2) Blood is used in cleansing in relation to the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16). (3) Blood is used in cleansing in relation to the Feast Offerings (Leviticus 23). (4) Blood is used in cleansing in relation to the five Levitical Offerings (Leviticus 1-7). (5) Blood is used in cleansing in relation to the atonement for the soul (Leviticus 17:11-14).
(1) Water is used in cleansing in relation to the separation and the ashes of the Red Heifer (Numbers 19). (2) Water is used in cleansing in relation to the consecration to priestly ministry (Leviticus 8:6). (3) Water is used in cleansing in relation to the cleansing of the leper (Leviticus 14:1-8). (4) Water is used in cleansing in relation to the different washings of the Law (Hebrews 9:10). (5) Water is used in relation to the remission of sins (Acts 2:38); Titus 3:5; Mark 16:16; Acts 22:16; Romans 6:3; I Peter 3:20-21; Ephesians 5:26; John 19:34; I John 5:6; Hebrews 9:19- 23).
Summary
A detailed study of the Jewish background of Christian baptism shows that it is vitally important, but God doesn't always tell us why. Obviously, the convert could repent and have a part in the life to come without it, but the emphasis seems to be pointing to the taking on of a new "believer" status illustrated as a "new birth" by immersion. In any covenant with the Lord the three items of God's Word, the blood, and a token are always present (Genesis 17:11). Jesus was always cautious to have three witnesses in everything He did (I John 5:7-8). In the Old Testament circumcision was considered the token of God's covenant, and in the New Testament we see the same wording concerning baptism as it is referred to as "circumcision made without hands" (Colossians 2:11-12). Whatever religious denomination, all believers should agree that immersion has its roots in the Jewish mikveh of Jesus' day, and it is of utmost importance for each of us to fulfill this righteous deed.
This article is provided by:
This article appeared in a past The Tree of Life Magazine
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
A Son is Given
Friday, December 12, 2014
Kingdom Expectations
An historic moment
Fifty years ago, on August 28, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. stood at the Lincoln Memorial and addressed a crowd of several hundred thousand who had come to the nation’s capitol for the “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.” King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, in which he shared his hopeful vision of justice and equality in our land, was a defining moment of the civil rights movement.
It was also an address steeped in Biblical language that directs us to consider the implications of the Kingdom of God for church and culture.
King set his plea in the context of American history by noting the backdrop of Lincoln’s statue: “Five score years ago a great American in whose symbolic shadow we stand today signed the Emancipation Proclamation.”[i]
As bright as that historical moment had been, its promise had not yet been fully realized: “One hundred years later the life of the Negro is still badly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination.” This state of affairs signaled that America had failed to honor the “sacred obligation” of guaranteeing unalienable rights for all in accord with her founding documents.
The call for civil rights was a call for “citizenship rights.”
A Biblical vision
But Dr. King drew on more than our nation’s political heritage in his oratory. The third generation Baptist minister found words in Scripture, especially the prophetic tradition, to express both discontent with present injustice and hope for better things to come.
King echoed Amos, declaring, “No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream” (cf. Amos 5:24).
He contextualized that vision with images of descendants of slaves and descendants of slave-holders sitting together “at the table of brotherhood” and of little black and white children playing hand-in-hand.
He called for the eradication of all vestiges of segregation and racial repression. And he drew from Isaiah 40:4-5 to express his dream in Biblical terms:
“I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low. The rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight. And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with…. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.”
Martin Luther King’s dream was truly one of Biblical proportions.
Over 1900 years before that march on Washington, Luke the evangelist quoted the same verses from Isaiah 40 when introducing John the Baptist (Luke 3:4-6). He understood John as paving the way for Jesus to come and fulfill prophecy. Luke tells us that Jesus himself quoted Isaiah when reading aloud in the synagogue at Nazareth:
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me … to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” (Luke 4:18-19)
Throughout his gospel, Luke shows Jesus’ special concern for the poor and the oppressed. In accord with the ancient prophetic vision, Jesus was ushering in a Kingdom that would be marked by justice and righteousness. And all in that Kingdom are called to love their neighbors and pursue such justice.
Our Kingdom calling
Dr. King’s dream is rooted in Scriptural promise that ultimately will only be fulfilled in the Kingdom of God.
But that doesn’t mean Christians are exempt from pursuing that dream now. In Jesus, the Kingdom of God broke into history and is now growing toward fulfillment. We are called to embrace a Kingdom vision now and to live by Kingdom values now – the kind of values that promote equality, racial harmony, and care for the downtrodden.
The world should be able to look at the church and see it leading the way in the areas of racial harmony and social justice. Within the church, King’s dream of racial reconciliation and equal treatment should be a present reality because that is what Jesus’ Kingdom demands. And as more and more hearts and minds are changed by the gospel, we should see Kingdom values increasingly infusing our culture and showing the power of Christ to accomplish what worldly politics has failed to achieve.
Thankfully, we have made positive strides as a nation in the direction of realizing Dr. King’s dream. The presence of an African-American man in the White House for his second term is proof of that.
But only someone whose eyes are blinded to reality would think that we’ve fully achieved a “beautiful symphony of brotherhood.” The vestiges of racism linger, even sometimes within the church. Perhaps the anniversary of Dr. King’s famous speech can be a time for Christians to reflect upon the call of the Kingdom of God on their lives and to commit themselves afresh to working to make the Biblical dream come true.
[i] All quotations are from the text of Dr. King’s speech at: http://www.archives.gov/press/exhibits/dream-speech.pdf
Article courtesy of colsoncenter.org
Saturday, December 6, 2014
Paul's letter to the Galatians
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Paul's letter to the Galatians [Gal. 2:15 - 3:9]
Thursday, October 9, 2014
Micah 6:6-8
Monday, August 11, 2014
Romans 10:8 - 15 ESV
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Enjoying God
By T.M. Moore
Daniel’s prayer in chapter 9 of his prophecy is one of most poignant and moving passages in the Old Testament. It brings me to tears every time I read it. In it he confesses the sins of Israel and calls on God to forgive and return His favor to His people, and to carry out His promises on their behalf.
Now we recall that Daniel was a godly man, a man the likes of whom rarely appears anywhere in Scripture. He is the “Daniel” we “dare” to be when courage, purity, and forthrightness are required. Yet in this prayer we see what might seem to be a very different Daniel – a man weeping for sin, desperate for forgiveness, terrified of judgment, and urgently pleading with God for mercy.
In fact, it is just these qualities, rarely glimpsed in the private, devotional life of Daniel, that made this Old Testament prophet the great and fearless servant of God he was. Daniel was fully engaged with God in all aspects of his being, life, and times. And when Daniel read the Word of God – as we see him doing in chapter 9 – he was fully engaged with Scripture as well.
In his book, On Christian Doctrine, Augustine taught that we will love to read and meditate in Scripture when we have learned to enjoy God Whom we meet there. The greater our enjoyment of God, as He reveals Himself in glory in His Word, the more we will enjoy reading His Word and love to immerse ourselves in it.
But this will only happen when we are “all-in” toward God – when we have learned to love Him and to come before Him with every aspect of our being. Augustine explains, “This is the divinely instituted rule of love: ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,’ He said, and, ‘Thou shalt love God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind.’ Thus all your thoughts and all your understanding should be turned toward Him from whom you receive these powers.”
Enjoying God is not merely an intellectual exercise, as Augustine explains elsewhere. If we approach the Word of God merely with our minds, that is, to learn some new truth, enlarge our understanding, or gain some new insight, while we may fulfill that intellectual quest, it’s doubtless this will lead us to the enjoyment of God which Scripture provides. Augustine continues, “[God] did not leave any part of life which should be free and find itself room to desire the enjoyment of something else.” We love God when we love Him all-in, when we are fully engaged in our hearts, minds, priorities, words, and deeds with the great adventure of reading Scripture to meet God in His glory. If we do not bring our entire selves to meet with God in Scripture, then we are distracted from Him in at least some part of our being. And, frankly, if He does not command our entire being, He will not be likely to engage us with His.
But let us not be mistaken about what we mean by “enjoying God.” In his prayer in Daniel 9, Daniel reveals a wide range of powerful emotions. He is deeply sorrowful, to the point of fasting in prayer and ashes (v. 3). He is lifted up in worship, envisioning God in all His greatness, power, and severity (vv. 4-9). He confesses his sin and that of the nation (v. 5). Daniel is overcome with humiliation and shame (vv. 6, 7), clings to hope in God alone (vv. 9, 13, 2tc.), surveys the sad state of the people of God in his day (v. 11), remembers both God’s faithfulness and Israel’s disobedience (vv. 11-13), dreads the judgment of God (v. 14), and urgently pleads for mercy, forgiveness, and the favor of the Lord (vv. 17-19).
Here is a man who was thoroughly enjoying the presence of God. Enjoyment, you see, should not be equated with “fun.” Fun is cheap, easy, and fleeting; enjoyment is hard work, and only comes when joy in the Lord is deeply embedded in every sector of the soul, and persistent, regardless of circumstances. Daniel enjoyed his prayer to the Lord because he was enjoying the presence of God, the sense of His looming, weighty glory and unchangeable righteousness, His unfailing promises and deeply penetrating Word. Daniel wept and pled with God as only one can who truly knows how to enjoy His presence and lean on His love.
And how was this possible? How was Daniel so able to enjoy God like this – “all-in” – when most of us rarely if ever know an encounter with God that even remotely compares with what we see here?
Because Daniel was “all-in” – heart, soul, mind, and strength – with his reading of Jeremiah 25:11, 12. He brought himself, entirely engaged, to reading and meditating on that text, and, after 70 years of being a captive in Babylon, Jeremiah’s words uncorked Daniel’s memory, ignited his affections, summoned his values and priorities, and commanded the next steps he sought from the Lord for that day’s service. When we come to the Scripture “all-in” like this, God will meet us “all-in”, and we will know the joy of His presence, and love the time we have with Him in His Word.
for more by T.M. Moore, please visit ColsonCenter.org
Friday, June 13, 2014
Duty or Delight
- by T.M. Moore
I want to insist that you are reading the Scriptures wrong if you’re not reading them daily and comprehensively. You need a plan to help you develop the discipline of setting aside time each day to read, meditate in, and study the Word of God, and to do so in a way that takes you through the whole of Scripture, over and over again.
Perhaps this sounds a bit “legalistic” to you? I’ve been told as much by pastors and church leaders who believe that, if they “wed” themselves to such a “rigid discipline”, as they see it, they’ll just become like the Pharisees of old, doing their duty and checking off their list of good works to prove their righteousness.
Is daily, comprehensive reading of the life-giving, glory-revealing, power-wielding Word of God a mere duty? Are we being “legalistic” by insisting that we’re only reading Scripture right when we read it this way?
It depends… Certainly, Bible reading can become a work of legalism by which we try to prove our “righteousness” and flaunt our “piety.” But just because it can be this doesn’t mean that it must or that God intends it should. What if, rather than being a mere duty, daily and comprehensive reading of God’s Word could become a great delight? This, after all, was how the prophet Jeremiah saw his time in the Scriptures. He wrote, “Your words were found and I did eat them, and Your Word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of my heart!” (Jer. 15:16). Job, the greatest man of his day, said that he valued his time in the Word of God more than the meals he took three times a day (Job 23:12). Jesus acknowledged that depending on Scripture is more important than our bodily nutritional needs, as important as these truly are (Matt. 4:4); at any rate, He seems to have taken great delight in all the counsel of God in Scripture.
So it depends on how we approach reading, meditating in, and studying the Word of God. If we approach it as a duty, something we “have” to do, then that’s what it will be. And as a “duty” our discipline of reading will not yield the fruit of transforming grace God intends. Instead, it will only make us smug and self-righteous.
On the other hand, if we learn to delight in the Word and to cherish the time we have to read it, we’re likely to find, like Jeremiah and Job and Jesus, that these moments in the Word of God are the most important, most enjoyable moments of our day.
So how do we get to that mindset?
Seek the Lord!
God is the Lord of the heart; He is able to shape our attitudes and affections when it comes to daily reading in His Word. If we will seek the Lord daily as we come to the Scriptures, looking to Him to help us delight in His Word, we can expect that He will do so, for this is His will for every one of us.
for more by T.M. Moore, visit ColsonCenter.org
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Eat and Drink Life
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Once Saved, Always Saved?
First of all, slogans like "Once Saved, Always Saved" are always regrettable because they polarize an issue, causing them to be touted or denounced vehemently not on the basis of truth as truth is, but only as it is represented in the stark world of sloganeering.
Take for instance, the present slogan—Once Saved, Always Saved. This is based upon the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints, but skews the doctrine by only representing a portion of its teaching. In fact, the slogan doesn't give us enough information to properly judge its merits. As well, the slogan is tautological in its simplicity, so that in being inherently true on its face, it is unable to say anything of value. One might as well say, "Once one has eternal life, he shall always have eternal life." This is obvious by the very definition of eternal life; and so, the slogan teaches us nothing of value. It is likely that this slogan (like most slogans) was created for a very particular purpose, but has long since (again, like most slogans) outgrown that purpose.
Instead, let's look at the doctrine to which the slogan makes reference.
When we speak of the perseverance of the saints, we are, in the first place, speaking not of any power within the grasp or intention of men who believe but rather of the strength of God's own redemptive and recreative work. Because men are saved by grace and not works, the sinful works of men are no great obstacle if God wishes to recreate a man into the image of his Son. The effect of Christ's blood in redemption is complete. So powerful is the blood of Christ that all sins of those that God ordains it to cover are washed in their entirety. As well, when God deems to recreate a man in the image of Christ, he begins the creative work and is faithful to complete it in his time despite the work's potential inclinations to the opposite.
When we speak of perseverance, we are really speaking of God's faithfulness rather than man's. As well, we are not speaking of any statement or decision a man could make. Part of the flaw in the slogan's respect is the preponderance of the contemporary understanding of being "saved." While salvation is a very biblical notion and Scripture does point out that man must be saved, believers too often view this as an effect of a profession of faith rather than the result of God's work of grace. The distinction is palpable. Obviously, anyone can make a profession of faith and live for a time with external evidence of the work of redemption in their lives and yet still be without the work of grace. Though, we might refer to them in our ignorance as the saved, they are anything but. Their profession and life are counterfeits of the life of the honestly saved. The doctrine of the perseverance of the saints declares that those who are of this kind were never recipients of the persevering work of God's grace, were not sealed by the Holy Spirit, and did not receive at anytime the cleansing, redemptive, and recreative work of Christ.
The doctrine of the perseverance of the saints maintains that those who overcome the world—those who abide in Christ—until they die and are taken up to heaven are the saved. They are the ones who persevere. Any who do not persevere simply were not saved for they did not experience the saving grace of God, were not conformed to the image of Christ, and were not forgiven of their sins. Therefore, it stands to reason that they as well never possessed eternal life—for eternal life is eternal.
The plain fact is that Scripture encourages believers to work in righteousness as they reflect the glory of their Lord. And Scripture offers security for those who have this work of grace alive in them. Those who claim belief but do not live righteously are persuaded to fear for their place and are invited to pursue God with all their hearts, minds, and souls that they might rest in the security of God's grace.
In light of 1 John 1:9's admonition to confess sin for faithful and just forgiveness, the question is often asked whether a true believer, unconfessed, might not be in danger of perdition. Yet, while confession of sin before God is integral to the obedient Christian life and no true Christian will go for too long in aggressive rebellion against the confession of sin, believers are always going some duration without confessing their sin. Even if it is only the time period between the sin and one's immediate regret for and confession of that sin, there is still a period of unconfessed sin. We do not believe that this unconfessed sin can keep the true child of God from receiving that which God has claimed is his inheritance and has sealed in him with the Holy Spirit. We do believe that unconfessed sin will forge a breach in one's earthly experience of the joys of heavenly life, but not that unconfessed sin can mar the surpassing grace of God. If this were so then every believer would be in danger of perdition at the time of his death for even as Christians, we recognize that we sin constantly in thought and deed.
Contributed by blueletterbible.org
Saturday, February 22, 2014
Luke 4:16-30
Friday, February 21, 2014
Psalm 139:23 - 24
Search me, Oh God, and know my heart;
Test me and know my thoughts.
See if there is any wicked way in me,
And lead me in the way everlasting.